I have a difficult time understanding how any honest and upright representative or senator, of the 109th Congress, can not consider the scientific impossibility of ten tons of steel and titanium, the amount of material comprising the engines of the Boeing 757 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, being consumed in a kerosene jet fuel fire as incontrovertible evidence that a Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon. Furthermore, if the sore lack of 757 aircraft wreckage and the dearth of remains of, what would inevitably be, a large quantity of engine material does not point to misrepresentations by the 9/11 Commission, what would? If it was a scientific impossibility for such a crash to yield almost zero wreckage of airframe and engine materials, and if the only conclusion that one could have drawn was that such an aircraft could not have crashed into the Pentagon, where, pray tell, are the alleged passengers that supposedly perished in the crash? Moreover, if a Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon, as alleged by the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government, what doubt does that throw on the government’s allegations that terrorists in high-jacked commercial airliners were totally responsible for the collapses of the WTC towers?

If there is not one bold senator or representative in Congress willing to officially contest the findings of the 9/11 Commission, this republic is in serious trouble. If, perchance, charges were brought against the Speaker of the House for personally murdering an associate member of the House, supposedly at the same time he was standing in full view at the podium, presiding over the House chamber, I am doubly sure that at least one representative, of either party, would have the temerity to stand and refute the charges on the basis of the impossibility of the Speaker committing the act. Therefore, if at least one representative would be willing to challenge murder charges against the Speaker of the House, on the basis of incontrovertible evidence and, perhaps, out of mere political loyalty, why wouldn’t at least one representative rise to challenge the scientific impossibility of the 9/11 Commission Report? Have we gone so far astray from the principles of law and justice in this republic as to allow the Executive Branch of the federal government to deceive the nation with impunity?

Continue reading »

 

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

 

etting started with your own business, even if it is just a buy and sell small business, is not as easy as simply financing for it and selling. A business requires that you invest money in it and make it grow. The money you invest is rarely so small a sum that, if lost, you can easily get over. Rather, it is usually a significantly large amount of money. Because of this, there is also a need for you to protect the security of your business. The way to do it is to hire a business law attorney who will be able to help you get started and assist throughout your business’ life.

In getting started, a business law attorney will be able to help you secure business permits and other legal documents to make your business fully operational without the fear of having to close down because of any possible violation. They will be able to educate you and your business partners about the different laws you need to know and how to oblige by them. A business law attorney will help you deal with your clients, customers and business partners in a secure way. They will help you with the different contracts involved and educate you on the different taxes you need to comply with and other fees. They will also educate you on Uniform Commercial Code, Competition Law, Financial Regulation and everything else you need to know. Moreover, they can help you create an effective and secure contract between you and your employees so that you are guaranteed they will not turn against you and your business. They will help you secure the satisfaction of your employees and yours as well.

Continue reading »

 

On January 1, 2012, California became the first state in the country to authorize a Flexible Purpose Corporation. This entity form is similar to that of a benefit corporation, but with a few distinctions.

Basics

Continue reading »

© 2012 djsolly.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha